Explore the complexities of M&A fraud cases through the lens of a recent legal dispute involving the acquisition of a gold mining company. Understand the background, details of the deal, the specific fraud allegation, legal outcomes, and insightful analysis. Dive into the Newmont Mining Corporation v. AngloGold Ashanti Limited case and its implications for future M&A transactions.
M&A Stories
October 18, 2018
Navigating the complexities of M&A fraud cases can be challenging, as illustrated by a recent lawsuit involving the acquisition of a gold mining company near Colorado Springs. Here’s a concise overview:
Background
The target company, a gold mine, was acquired by a South African global gold mining company (the seller). Prior to the sale, the seller was aware of a third party allegedly acquiring mineral interests in a plot of land on the target’s property.
The Deal
In 2015, the seller offered to sell the company to a Denver-based buyer, the world’s largest gold mining company. The stock purchase agreement, valued at around $820 million, was finalized in New York City on August 3, 2015.
The Allegation
Two years later, the buyer filed a lawsuit in a Manhattan federal district court, seeking damages related to deficiencies in the mill, including the undisclosed third-party mineral interest. The buyer claimed that the seller intentionally failed to disclose this information before the closing.
Legal Outcome
The court dismissed the fraud claim, stating that the buyer’s allegations did not prove intentional or reckless omission. The court highlighted the absence of evidence showing the seller’s motive and opportunity to commit fraud. However, the buyer was given the opportunity to file an amended complaint.
Analysis
While the seller breached the contract by not disclosing the third-party mineral interests, it did not automatically constitute fraud. The court emphasized that intentional or reckless omission is crucial for a fraud claim, opening the possibility of higher damages.
Why did the buyer make a fraud claim when it already had a breach of contract claim? It might be because damages for breach of contract might be limited by a purchase agreement indemnification cap. Damages for a fraud claim would probably not be limited by the indemnification cap provision.
Case Reference:
Newmont Mining Corporation v. AngloGold Ashanti Limited, No. 17-CV-8065 (RA), United States District Court, S.D. New York (September 30, 2018).
By John McCauley: I help people start, grow, buy and sell their businesses.
Email: jmccauley@mk-law.com
Profile: http://www.martindale.com/John-B-McCauley/176725-lawyer.htm
Telephone: 714 273-6291
Check out my book: Buying Assets of a Small Business: Problems Taken From Recent Legal Battles
Legal Disclaimer
The blogs on this website are provided as a resource for general information for the public. The information on these web pages is not intended to serve as legal advice or as a guarantee, warranty or prediction regarding the outcome of any particular legal matter. The information on these web pages is subject to change at any time and may be incomplete and/or may contain errors. You should not rely on these pages without first consulting a qualified attorney.
Recent Comments