Buyer’s Liability in M&A Deals: Understanding Product Line Exceptions

Share

Explore the concept of buyer’s liability in M&A deals and the impact of product line exceptions. Learn from the McAllister v. Mcdermott case and understand how to manage potential risks when acquiring manufacturing businesses.

M&A Stories

December 02, 2020

Introduction:

When a company buys the assets of another business, they typically aren’t responsible for any claims related to products made by the seller, unless they agree to take on that risk in the purchase agreement. However, some states have a “product line exception” that changes this rule. Let’s dive into an example that helps explain this concept.

The Story:

Back in 1985, a company bought another company that made products containing asbestos. The agreement said the buyer wouldn’t be accountable for any problems caused by the seller’s products.

The Legal Issue:

A person who worked with the seller’s asbestos-based products sued the buyer after developing a serious illness. The lawsuit landed in a Louisiana federal court. The buyer argued that they shouldn’t be held responsible because they hadn’t agreed to take on the seller’s product liabilities.

The Twist:

The person suing agreed that the buyer didn’t agree to take on those liabilities. But they said a Pennsylvania rule called the “product line exception” should still make the buyer responsible. This rule is used in cases where a buyer takes over a seller’s manufacturing business assets and makes the same things. In this situation, the buyer can be held accountable for defects in products even if they were made by the seller before.

The Buyer’s Argument:

The buyer said, “Hold on, the rule about Pennsylvania’s laws in our agreement only applies to interpreting that agreement, not to other things.” They claimed that the rule didn’t apply to this case.

The Court’s Decision:

The court agreed with the buyer’s argument and ruled in their favor.

This case is referred to as McAllister v. Mcdermott, INC., Civil Action No. 18-361-SDD-RLB, United States District Court, M.D. Louisiana, (August 14, 2020) 

Key Lesson:

When buying a manufacturing company’s assets, it’s smart for the buyer to avoid agreeing to take on the seller’s product liabilities. In states like Pennsylvania and California, where the “product line exception” exists, there’s a chance the buyer could still be responsible for those liabilities. This risk can be managed with tools like insurance.

By John McCauley: I help people manage M&A risks involving privately held companies.

Email:             jmccauley@mk-law.com

Profile:            http://www.martindale.com/John-B-McCauley/176725-lawyer.htm

Telephone:      714 273-6291

Check out my book: Buying Assets of a Small Business: Problems Taken From Recent Legal Battles

Legal Disclaimer

The blogs on this website are provided as a resource for general information for the public. The information on these web pages is not intended to serve as legal advice or as a guarantee, warranty or prediction regarding the outcome of any particular legal matter. The information on these web pages is subject to change at any time and may be incomplete and/or may contain errors. You should not rely on these pages without first consulting a qualified attorney.

Posted in sale of product line, successor liability Tagged with: , , , , , , , ,

Recent Comments

Categories