Court Decision: Buyer Assumes Liability for Lead Paint Poisoning in M&A Deal

Share

Explore a recent Wisconsin court decision on an M&A case where a buyer assumed liabilities for lead paint poisoning. Gain insights into the court’s interpretation of the asset purchase agreement and its impact on M&A transactions.

M&A Stories

November 14, 2018

In a recent case, a Wisconsin federal district court ruled on a lawsuit involving the assumption of liabilities by a buyer in a 1983 asset purchase agreement. The case centered on injuries from lead paint manufactured by the seller.

Background: Buyer acquired Seller’s assets in 1983, expressly assuming all liabilities, except those explicitly excluded in the asset purchase agreement. Several individuals filed a lawsuit, asserting that Buyer should be held responsible for lead poisoning caused by paint manufactured by Seller.

Court Ruling: The court examined the language of the asset purchase agreement and found no exclusion of the lead poisoning claims. Consequently, the court ruled that Buyer had indeed assumed any liability of Seller related to lead poisoning claims.

Key Points: The court interpreted the ambiguous language in the agreement to align with the intent of both Buyer and Seller.

This case underscores the advantage of asset deals, where buyers can selectively assume seller liabilities. Typically, agreements specify the liabilities assumed by the buyer, excluding certain identified ones.

Comment: While the agreement’s wording provided some ambiguity, the court concluded that Buyer had, in fact, assumed responsibility for the lead poisoning claims. This case highlights the importance of clarity in defining assumed liabilities in M&A transactions.

Case Reference:

Burton v. American Cyanamid, Case Nos. 07-CV-0303, 07-CV-0441, 10-CV-0075, United States District Court, E.D. Wisconsin (November 2, 2018).

By John McCauley: I help people start, grow, buy and sell their businesses.

Email: jmccauley@mk-law.com

Profile:            http://www.martindale.com/John-B-McCauley/176725-lawyer.htm

Telephone:      714 273-6291

Check out my book: Buying Assets of a Small Business: Problems Taken From Recent Legal Battles

Legal Disclaimer

The blogs on this website are provided as a resource for general information for the public. The information on these web pages is not intended to serve as legal advice or as a guarantee, warranty or prediction regarding the outcome of any particular legal matter. The information on these web pages is subject to change at any time and may be incomplete and/or may contain errors. You should not rely on these pages without first consulting a qualified attorney.

Posted in asset buyer's assumption of seller's liabilities by contract, asset seller's liabilities, asset vs stock deal, assumed liabilities, excluded liabilities, successor liability Tagged with: , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Recent Comments

Categories