Texas Court Narrows Reach of Noncompete Agreement in Grocery Store M&A

Share

Explore a significant M&A case in Texas where a court restricted the geographic reach of a noncompetition covenant in the sale of Hispanic grocery stores. The buyer, owner of La Michoacana and El Ahorro chains, faced noncompete breaches, leading to a legal battle. Discover the key takeaway for buyers to craft reasonable noncompete agreements and avoid prolonged litigation.

M&A Stories

August 29, 2018

In a notable M&A case, a Texas court has limited the geographic scope of a noncompetition covenant involving the sale of Hispanic grocery stores. The buyer, who owns La Michoacana and El Ahorro chains with a total of 150 stores in Texas and Oklahoma, had purchased five Mi Rancho stores from the seller in 2007.

As part of the agreement, the seller signed a noncompetition clause, preventing them from operating a Hispanic-themed grocery store within 10 miles of the sold stores, any existing La Michoacana or El Ahorro stores, or any future ones within 15 years.

In 2012, the buyer accused the seller of breaching the noncompete agreement by operating competing stores in Irving, Texas; Oklahoma City, Oklahoma; Houston, Texas; and Pasadena, Texas. The jury ruled in favor of the buyer, awarding damages, including punitive damages.

Post-trial, the seller sought to modify the noncompete agreement, presenting expert testimony that Hispanic grocery store customers typically travel no more than 3 miles. The trial court granted the motion, adjusting the exclusionary radius to 3 miles around the sold stores.

The appellate court upheld the decision, emphasizing that a reasonable noncompete agreement must have limitations on time, geographical area, and scope of activity. Texas law mandates reforming overreaching covenants to only prohibit competition against the business sold.

Key Takeaway: Buyers should craft reasonable noncompete agreements to avoid protracted and costly litigation, protecting the purchased business’s goodwill without imposing unnecessary restraints.

Case Reference:

Ortega v. Abel, No. 01-16-00415-CV, Court of Appeals of Texas, First District, Houston, (Opinion issued August 23, 2018). https://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=12751057774274517688&q=Ortega+v.+Abel&hl=en&as_sdt=400006

By John McCauley: I help people start, grow, buy and sell their businesses.

Email: jmccauley@mk-law.com

Profile:            http://www.martindale.com/John-B-McCauley/176725-lawyer.htm

Telephone:        714 273-6291

Check out my book: Buying Assets of a Small Business: Problems Taken From Recent Legal Battles

Legal Disclaimer

The blogs on this website are provided as a resource for general information for the public. The information on these web pages is not intended to serve as legal advice or as a guarantee, warranty or prediction regarding the outcome of any particular legal matter. The information on these web pages is subject to change at any time and may be incomplete and/or may contain errors. You should not rely on these pages without first consulting a qualified attorney.

Posted in covenant not to compete, reformation Tagged with: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Recent Comments

Categories