Explore a case study in M&A where the buyer’s inability to sue the seller is examined due to contractual limitations on claims beyond representations and warranties. M&A Stories December 10, 2020 Introduction: When considering the purchase of a business, it’s…
Blog Archives
Buyer Cannot Sue Seller for Withholding Pending Customer Loss Information
Posted in contracts, due diligence, extra-contractual fraud, fraud in business sale, non-reliance clause Tagged with: asset purchase agreement, Business acquisition, Business Transactions, buyer-seller dispute, contractual limitations, contractual representations, Delaware law, due diligence, fraud, Humana contracts, Legal action, loss of major customer, M&A legal case study
Israeli Pharma Buyer’s Fraud Claim Against Mexican Pharma Seller Dismissed
Explore the case of an Israeli pharma company’s fraud claim against a Mexican pharmaceutical seller and its dismissal. Learn about the importance of due diligence in M&A deals. M&A Stories December 19, 2018 In 2015, an Israeli pharma company (Buyer)…
Posted in compliance with all applicable laws, extra-contractual fraud, fraud in business sale, indemnification cap, representations and warranties Tagged with: Buyer's lawsuit, Due diligence in M&A, fraud claim dismissal, Israeli pharma buyer, Legal violations, M&A legal case, Mexican FDA compliance, Mexican pharmaceutical seller, Representation and Warranty, Thorough due diligence
M&A Deal Lessons: Honesty and Due Diligence Are Key
Learn from a real M&A case involving digital marketing and concessions. Discover the importance of honesty and due diligence in M&A deals. Get insights from the Cinema Scene Marketing & Promotions, Inc. v. Calident Capital, LLC case. M&A Stories November…
Posted in anti-reliance clause, due diligence, extra-contractual fraud, negligent misrepresentation, reliance Tagged with: Antitrust concerns, Cinema Scene Marketing & Promotions case, Competition in M&A, Digital marketing company acquisition, Due diligence importance, Honesty in M&A, Legal dispute resolution, M&A case study, M&A deal lessons, Private equity firm negotiations
Delaware Court Rules in Favor of Buyer in Environmental Misrepresentation Case
Explore the Delaware Superior Court’s ruling favoring a global specialty chemical company in an M&A case involving environmental misrepresentation. Dive into the details of the $3.2 billion stock purchase agreement, the seller’s alleged fraud, and the court’s emphasis on accurate…
Posted in extra-contractual fraud, fraud in business sale, fraudulent omission Tagged with: Ashland LLC v. Heyman, Court ruling, Delaware Superior Court, due diligence information, environmental misrepresentation, Fraud claim, global chemical company, legal battle, Linden property, M&A legal blog, M&A Transactions, New Jersey-based chemicals maker, off-site contamination, remedial work, seller's statements, specialty chemical company, stock purchase agreement
Recent Comments