Dive into the captivating world of mergers and acquisitions with our latest blog post, ‘Navigating the Legal Landscape: A Tale of Restaurant IP in M&A.’ Uncover the twists and turns of a high-stakes case involving the sale of intellectual property…
Blog Archives
Navigating Trademark Pitfalls in M&A: Lessons from Nutradose Labs Case
Explore the intricate world of M&A legalities with our latest blog post, “Navigating Trademark Pitfalls in M&A: Lessons from Nutradose Labs Case.” Delve into the riveting case of Nutradose Labs, LLC v. Bio Dose Pharma, LLC, as we unravel the…
Posted in trademark infringement Tagged with: Asset sales, Bankruptcy proceedings, Board members, Business brokers, business growth, Business owners, Business ventures, case reference, CEOs, CFOs, Court rulings, Entrepreneurship, ESOP professionals, Investment bankers, Lawyers, Legal consequences, Legal Precedents, M&A acquisitions, M&A landscape, M&A legalities, Nutradose Labs case, Trademark Infringement, Trademark license agreement, Trademark rights, United States District Court S.D. Florida, wealth advisers
Navigating M&A Earnout Disputes: A Lesson from Nomar Enterprises, LLC v. Rugged Solutions America, LLC
Explore the intricate world of M&A transactions through our latest blog post, ‘Navigating M&A Earnout Disputes: A Lesson from Nomar Enterprises, LLC v. Rugged Solutions America, LLC.’ Uncover the strategic use of earnouts, the risks they pose for both buyers…
Posted in problems with earnouts Tagged with: asset purchase agreement, Breach of contract, Business acquisition, case reference, Court proceedings, dispute resolution, earnouts, EBITDA metrics, financial metric disputes, fraud claims, Houston federal district court, independent accountant, Industry Insights, Legal Blog, Legal Disputes, Legal lessons, M&A Risks, M&A Transactions, Nomar Enterprises LLC v. Rugged Solutions America LLC, rugged computer industry, strategic management
Navigating Earnout Disputes: Expert Determination vs. Arbitration
Explore a real M&A case (Sapp v. Indus. Action Services, LLC) involving earnout disputes and the legal battle between expert determination and arbitration. Learn the key findings, implications, and the court’s role in resolving EBITDA threshold disagreements. M&A Stories November…
Posted in arbitration vs expert determination, problems with earnouts Tagged with: accounting firm, arbitration, asset sale, Buyer-seller disagreement, case reference, court intervention, Earnout disputes, EBITDA thresholds, expert determination, Industrial Services, Legal Actions, M&A Disputes, Sapp v. Indus. Action Services LLC, Third Circuit Court
Avoiding M&A Pitfalls: Buyer Beware in Bankruptcy
Explore the legal intricacies of M&A transactions and learn from a real case – In Re Sanders. Discover how due diligence and reliance on seller representations can impact the dischargeability of seller debts in bankruptcy. M&A Stories October 5, 2023…
Posted in nondischargeable debt in bankruptcy Tagged with: Auto Recovery Business, bankruptcy, Bond Agreements, Business acquisition, Buyer Beware, Buyer's Rights, case reference, Court ruling, Customer Contracts, Dischargeability of Debts, due diligence, Fraudulent Representations, In Re Sanders, legal proceedings, Lot Leases, M&A pitfalls, Repossession Business, Seller Debts, seller fraud, Wharton School of Business
Mitigating Successor Liability Risks in Asset Acquisitions Involving Equity
Explore the key considerations and risks associated with acquiring assets in M&A deals involving buyer equity. Learn how successor liability risks can be effectively mitigated, with insights from the Credit Card Services, Inc v. Joe Teh Chuang case. M&A Stories…
Posted in problems with successor liability Tagged with: Acquisition strategies, asset acquisitions, Business acquisition, Buyer equity, Buyer's exposure, case reference, Confidential information, Credit Card Services Inc v Joe Teh Chuang, legal proceedings, Liability in M&A, M&A deals, M&A legal blog, Mitigating risks, successor liability, trade secrets
Seller’s $14.5 Million Fraud Claim Fails Against Majority Shareholder in Stock Deal
Read about a case where a $14.5 million fraud claim by siblings against a majority shareholder in a pharmaceutical company stock deal failed due to oversight in reviewing legal documents. Learn the importance of thorough legal document examination before finalizing…
Posted in fraud in business sale, fraudulent inducement, shareholder release Tagged with: attorney guidance, case reference, consequences, Fraud claim, investment, Legal action, legal documents, M&A legal blog, majority shareholder, New York state trial court, pharmaceutical company, read before signing, stock deal, transaction documents
Recent Comments