Explore the intricacies of M&A earnouts and legal disputes in this compelling blog post dissecting the Butler v. Ferguson Enterprises Inc. case. Gain valuable insights into contract negotiations, operational matters, and the pivotal role of judicial scrutiny in post-closing disputes.…
Blog Archives
Challenging a M&A Buyer’s Good Faith in an Earnout Dispute
Posted in problems with earnouts Tagged with: Business acquisitions, business continuity, business law, business strategies, Butler v. Ferguson Enterprises Inc., Buyer-Seller Agreements, CFO insights, Cincinnati, contract law, contract negotiations, Earnout disputes, earnouts, Entrepreneurship, judicial scrutiny, legal cases, Legal Challenges, Legal Disputes, legal implications, legal insights, legal recourse, Litigation, M&A, Mergers and Acquisitions, operational matters, operational performance, Post-closing disputes, profitability, stakeholder management
Enforcing Unwritten Promises: Manager’s Share in APA Purchase Price
Explore a case where verbal promises to key employees in business sales led to legal complications. Learn how unwritten agreements can affect M&A deals and the importance of documenting such agreements. February 19, 2020 Introduction: It’s common for business sellers…
Key Lessons from a Palo Alto M&A Dispute
Explore a significant M&A dispute involving a Palo Alto company and the key lessons learned from this case. Understand the importance of addressing debt subordination in M&A deals to avoid costly disputes. M&A Stories December 13, 2018 In December 2018,…
Posted in implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing, promissory note, subordination Tagged with: Bank Financing, business law, buyer-seller dispute, Court ruling, Debt Subordination, implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing, Key Lessons, Legal case reference, legal insights, M&A dispute, Mergers and Acquisitions, Palo Alto M&A Dispute, Post-Closing Down Payment, purchase price adjustments, stock purchase agreement
Upholding Noncompetition Covenants: Safeguarding Business Value
Explore the intricacies of M&A legal battles and the crucial role of noncompetition covenants in safeguarding business value. Delve into the Shimon v. Paper Enters., Inc. case, revealing insights into the enforcement of noncompete clauses, potential damages, and legal actions.…
Posted in covenant not to compete Tagged with: Acquired Business, asset purchase agreement, Breach of contract, business law, Business Purchase Agreement, Business Safeguarding, Business Value Protection, Buyer's Recourse, Court Injunctions, Janitorial Supply Business, Legal Actions, Legal battles, legal insights, Legal Precedents, legal recourse, M&A legal, M&A Narratives, Market Area Restrictions, Mergers and Acquisitions, New Venture Establishment, Noncompete Clauses, Noncompetition covenants, Paper Products Distribution, Repackaging Industry, Sales Impact, Shimon v. Paper Enters. Inc., Trending Legal Topics
Federal Court Rules on Whether M&A Asset Buyer Is Subject to Seller Injunction
Explore the legal intricacies of M&A asset acquisitions with our latest blog post on the federal court ruling in ADT LLC v. NorthStar Alarm Services, LLC. Uncover buyer responsibilities, liability nuances, and the impact of seller federal injunctions in this…
Posted in post asset purchase issues, seller's federal injunctions Tagged with: ADT case, ADT LLC v. NorthStar Alarm Services LLC, ADT vs. NorthStar Alarm, asset acquisitions, asset purchase agreement, business contracts, business decisions, business law, business stakeholders, buyer accountability, buyer notice, buyer responsibilities, case analysis, Court decisions, de facto merger doctrine, Federal court ruling, federal trademark laws, injunction implications, Legal Developments, legal obligations, Legal Precedents, liability nuances, M&A legal, security industry, seller federal injunctions
Dispute Arises Over Certificate of Deposit Ownership in Post-Closing M&A Scenario
Explore the intricacies of M&A contract disputes in this gripping blog post by John McCauley. Delve into a recent clash between buyer and seller over the ownership of a $150,000 certificate of deposit post-closing. Uncover the importance of meticulous contract…
Posted in cash and cash equivalents, Description of business assets purchased Tagged with: ambiguity in contracts, asset deal, asset purchase agreement, Bankruptcy court, business law, buyer-seller clash, cash and cash equivalents, certificate of deposit, contract disputes, contract drafting, contract interpretation, court intervention, E.D. Tennessee, excluded assets, In Re HC Liquidation Inc., Legal action, Legal intricacies, M&A, Mergers and Acquisitions, Post-closing disputes, purchased assets
Unraveling the Legal Threads: When the Buyer’s Owner Faces the Fallout
Delve into the intricacies of M&A legal challenges with our latest blog post, ‘Unraveling the Legal Threads: When the Buyer’s Owner Faces the Fallout.’ Explore the captivating case of Mohegan Lake Motors, Inc. v. Maoli, where the buyer’s owner becomes…