Explore the legal complexities of a recent M&A case in Santa Clarita, California, where a buyer faced unexpected challenges related to the seller’s unfunded multi-employer pension plan obligation. Gain insights into the court’s decision and the implications for buyers in…
Blog Archives
Court Decision: Buyer Unable to Sue Seller for Fraudulent Misrepresentations in Target’s Data Room
Dive into the intricate world of M&A transactions with our latest blog post on an important Delaware court decision. Uncover the legal nuances surrounding buyer-seller relationships, data room disclosures, and the impact of contractual agreements. Gain valuable insights into the…
Posted in anti-reliance clause, fraud in business sale Tagged with: anti-reliance clause, Breach of contract, Business acquisitions, buyer protection, Buyer-seller relationships, Chyronhego Corporation v. Wight, Contractual agreements, data room disclosures, Delaware court decision, due diligence, financial projections, fraudulent misrepresentations, Indemnification caps, Industry Insights, industry-specific coverage, legal analysis, Legal Developments, legal implications, legal recourse, M&A deals, M&A Transactions, seller responsibilities, stock purchase agreement
Court Awards Investment Bank $1.7 Million Advisory Fee Despite Lack of Direct Involvement in Business Sale
Uncover the intricacies of a recent M&A legal case where an investment banking firm secured a $1.7 million advisory fee, despite not being the procuring cause. Delve into the details of the Carriage Hill Management, LLC v. Boston Lobster Feast,…
Posted in investment banker/business broker Tagged with: $1.7 million, advisory fee, asset purchase agreement, Boston Lobster Feast, Business owners, Business Sale, Carriage Hill Management, CFOs, confidentiality agreement, contractual language, Court ruling, engagement agreement, financial obligations, Industry specifics, Investment Banking, Legal Developments, legal professionals, M&A landscape, M&A legal case, procurement cause, unforeseen obligations
Federal Court Rules on Whether M&A Asset Buyer Is Subject to Seller Injunction
Explore the legal intricacies of M&A asset acquisitions with our latest blog post on the federal court ruling in ADT LLC v. NorthStar Alarm Services, LLC. Uncover buyer responsibilities, liability nuances, and the impact of seller federal injunctions in this…
Posted in post asset purchase issues, seller's federal injunctions Tagged with: ADT case, ADT LLC v. NorthStar Alarm Services LLC, ADT vs. NorthStar Alarm, asset acquisitions, asset purchase agreement, business contracts, business decisions, business law, business stakeholders, buyer accountability, buyer notice, buyer responsibilities, case analysis, Court decisions, de facto merger doctrine, Federal court ruling, federal trademark laws, injunction implications, Legal Developments, legal obligations, Legal Precedents, liability nuances, M&A legal, security industry, seller federal injunctions
Recent Comments