Monthly Archives: June 2022

BUYER OF BUSINESS LOSES MAJOR CUSTOMERS AND UNSUCCESSFULLY CLAIMS MISREPRESENTATION BY SELLER

The buyers purchased the seller’s direct marketing coupon refrigerator magnet business for $1.5 million. The buyers defaulted on making payments to the seller after losing two major customers in the first six months after the closing and sued the seller

Posted in Problems when business fails after closing Tagged with: , , , , , , , , , ,

BUYER WITHDRAWS FROM BANKRUPTCY DEAL FOR MAJOR BUS STATION DUE TO LANDLORD’S DEMANDS

The proposed buyer agreed to pay $100 million for a major Manhattan bus station. The purchase price included assuming a $72 million loan from the seller’s foreign investors. The buyer backed out in the face of demands by the landlord,

Posted in Problems with distressed business seller unexpired tenant leases Tagged with: , , , , , , , , ,

SELLER’S MISUSE OF BANKRUPTCY ALMOST JEOPARDIZED BUYER’S ACQUISITION OF FORKLIFT DEALER BUSINESS

Bankruptcy court finds that seller’s president and his lawyer exercised bad faith in trying to sell the business in bankruptcy when in fact seller was solvent and bankruptcy was not authorized by the board of directors. M&A Stories June 23,

Posted in problem with seller co-owners Tagged with: , , , , , , , , ,

STALKING HORSE BIDDER AWARDED $4.2 MILLION BREAKUP FEE/COST REIMBURSEMENT IN FACE OF CREDITORS CHALLENGE

The asset purchase agreement provided for a breakup fee and expense reimbursement. However, the bankruptcy court did not approve the deal protection terms before the auction. Nevertheless, the court approved the breakup fee and expense reimbursement because it resulted in

Posted in problems with creditors of distressed business Tagged with: ,

Buyer’s Obligation to Pay Finder’s Fee Ruled Unenforceable in M&A Case

The seller did not disclose the terms of the finder’s agreement and led the buyer to believe that the finder’s role was limited, and that the finder could be compensated with hockey tickets, while arbitration awarded a $2 million finder’s

Posted in Problem with Investment Banker/Broker/Finder Fee Tagged with: , , , , , , , , , , ,

COURT FINDS NONCOMPETE COVENANT GIVEN BY SELLER TO BUYER LIKELY UNENFORCEABLE DUE TO EMPLOYMENT CONNECTION

Court said that Arkansas applies stricter scrutiny to noncompete agreements in employment contracts than those connected with a sale of a business. M&A Stories June 1, 2022 Introduction: In a recent court case, a noncompetition covenant given by a seller

Posted in Problem with seller owner's competition Tagged with: , , , , , , , , ,

Recent Comments

Categories