Blog Archives

Seller of target receiving privately held buyer stock failed to allege facts that established that buyer’s alleged fraud caused seller’s economic loss

Target is a Dallas based technology-consulting limited liability company and was owned by Sellers. Buyer is a technology services company then based in Jacksonville, Florida, and then owned by Buyer’s Owners. Buyer is privately held and not publicly traded. In

Posted in buyer's stock as currency, federal securities fraud, financial representation and warranty, purchase price, representations and warranties, stock purchase agreement, tying fraud to economic loss

Seller of company not responsible for buyer’s post-closing failure to obtain electroplating permit

Seller was the owner of Target, a business located in Palo Alto, California that specializes in the electroplating of metal components for industrial use. On June 19, 2014, Seller executed a letter of intent to sell all of Seller’s shares

Posted in Buyer beware, compliance with all applicable laws, due diligence, land use issues, representations and warranties, stock purchase agreement

Buyer can sue seller of urgent care centers for lost profits from Target’s alleged material breach of 3rd party payor contracts

Buyer is based in the greater Baltimore area and operates urgent care centers and clinics throughout central Maryland, Delaware, Pennsylvania, and Virginia. In January 2015, Buyer purchased Target from Seller, a physician. Target operated urgent care facilities in Pennsylvania. According

Posted in Buyer beware, due diligence, economic loss doctrine, material contracts, representations and warranties

Israeli pharma buyer’s fraud claim against seller of Mexican pharma company tossed out by court

In 2015, Buyer, an Israeli pharma company purchased Target, a Mexican pharmaceutical company, from Sellers, and the intellectual property used by Target from a Sellers affiliate. The total sale price came to $2.3 Billion. After the closing, Buyer claimed that

Posted in compliance with all applicable laws, extra-contractual fraud, fraud in business sale, indemnification cap, representations and warranties

No fraud in alleged buyer’s financial misrepresentations concerning buyer’s equity received by seller of company

Seller was two related companies, one, a provider of litigation support and e-discovery services and the other, a provider of temporary legal staffing to law firms and corporations. Seller along with Seller Affiliate, a related company providing various litigation support

Posted in due diligence, fraud in business sale, material, receipt of buyer equity or security, receipt of buyer equity or security, reliance

Court permits stock buyer of company to sue sellers for pre-closing pension-insurance problems

Target is a manufacturer based in Kentucky with customers worldwide. In July 2016, Buyer purchased Target from Sellers for approximately $87 million. Sellers sold Target to Buyer through a stock purchase agreement dated July 11, 2016. Some Target employees worked

Posted in compliance with all applicable laws, financial representation and warranty, representations and warranties

Seller did not have to disclose to buyer receipt of customer notice of nonrenewal of material contract

Buyer is a company headquartered in Boulder, Colorado. Buyer is a publicly traded company that provides high-capacity dark fiber, wavelength, IT infrastructure services and ethernet products and services. Since its founding, it has made forty-one acquisitions of fiber and data center companies,

Posted in Buyer beware, representation and warranty about customers, representations and warranties, stock purchase agreement

Stock sellers lose opening legal battle over buyer’s environmental claim

In November 2007, Sellers of Target agreed to sell Target to Buyer through a stock purchase agreement. When the sale closed in December 2007, Sellers placed $16.7 million into escrow to secure any post-closing claims that Buyer might assert. Target’s

Posted in environment representations and warranties, escrow, indemnification, representations and warranties

Allegations were enough, if true to establish that business sellers breached their noncompetition, nonsolicitation and confidentiality covenants

Buyer is a full-service specialty contract manufacturer of automotive, household, insecticide, and pesticide aerosols, based in St. Clair, Missouri, about 50 miles southwest of St Louis. Target is a specialty chemical contract packager, which manufactures aerosols, liquids, and bag-on-valve products,

Posted in covenant not to compete, hiring seller's employees, no kickback or bribe rep, nondisclosure agreement, trade secret misappropriation

Buyer of construction company obtains judgment against stock seller for target’s pre-closing noncompliance with minority business participation program

Seller and another shareholder, each owned 50% of Target, a large heavy construction company based in the New York City area. Buyer, a Spanish group of companies, purchased all of Target stock from the two shareholders pursuant to a stock

Posted in due diligence, minority business participation program, no pending government investigations or inquiries, representations and warranties, stock purchase agreement

Recent Comments

Categories