Blog Archives

Bootstrapping Doctrine No Bar to Business Buyer’s Fraud Claim

Introduction A buyer of a closely held business often has limited recourse against a seller if the deal turns out bad.  Even if fraud is involved, the buyer must run the gauntlet of indemnification cap, survival period, exclusive remedy, non-reliance,

Posted in bootstrapping doctrine, exclusive remedy, fraud carveout, fraud in business sale, non-reliance clause Tagged with:

APA Integration Provision and Exclusive Remedy Clause Bars Seller Claim

Introduction A seller of a mortgage service business could not sue its asset buyer in tort for negligent misrepresentation. The deal The seller was a Denver based company that was formed after the 2008 financial crisis to assess and verify

Posted in earn out, economic loss doctrine, exclusive remedy, integration clause Tagged with: , ,

Boilerplate provision (fraud carve-out) saves the buyer’s fraud lawsuit against the seller of a business

The seller owned and operated a food tray business that sold rigid trays, foam trays, and absorbent pads to food handlers and processors. In the summer of 2014, the seller sought to sell its North American foam tray and pads

Posted in exclusive remedy, fraud carveout

Recent Comments

Categories