Explore the legal intricacies of M&A transactions with our latest blog post. Delve into the case of Barranco v. 3D Systems Corporation, where a breach of noncompetition agreement in the 3D printing industry led to significant court-awarded damages. Gain insights…
Monthly Archives: May 2018
Court Awards Buyer Damages for Seller’s Breach of Noncompetition Covenant in 3D Printing Industry
Posted in covenant not to compete Tagged with: 3D printing industry, additive manufacturing, Breach of contract, Business acquisitions, business law, business ownership, business sellers, Buyer Damages, Competitive Activities, contractual disputes, Contractual obligations, Court Case, Court ruling, entrepreneur advice, Legal compliance, Legal Disputes, legal implications, legal ramifications, M&A legal, Mergers and Acquisitions, noncompetition agreement, technology acquisition
Asset Buyer’s Liability in Post-Closing Product Claims: What You Need to Know
Navigate the intricate world of mergers and acquisitions with insights into post-closing liabilities and product claims. Learn from a recent case in New Mexico’s federal district court, delving into the complexities of asset buyer’s liability and strategic maneuvers in M&A…
Posted in successor liability Tagged with: asset buyer's liability, asset purchase agreement, California law, legal defense strategies, legal doctrines, legal implications, legal nuances, Legal Precedents, Legal Risks, Legal Strategies, liability avoidance, Liability in acquisitions, liability in asset acquisition, M&A case study, M&A legal, manufacturing methods, Mergers and Acquisitions, New Mexico law, Product claims, product design, product liability, product line exception
M&A Buyer Unable to Challenge Net Working Capital Purchase Price Adjustment
Explore the intricate world of M&A purchase price adjustments through a compelling legal saga. Uncover the complexities and pitfalls of net working capital valuation in mergers and acquisitions. Delve into a recent case revealing the challenges faced by buyers in…
Posted in mutual mistake, net working capital adjustment, reformation of contract Tagged with: asset purchase agreement, bankruptcy, business law, Business Transactions, buyer, Case Study, Commercial Law, contract law, contract reformation, corporate finance, dealmaking, diligence, legal implications, Litigation, M&A legal, M&A professionals, Mergers and Acquisitions, mutual mistake, net working capital, purchase price adjustment, risk management, seller, transparency, Valuation
Buyer Beware: Understanding Liability in Asset Purchases
Dive into the intricate world of mergers and acquisitions with our latest blog post, ‘Buyer Beware: Understanding Liability in Asset Purchases.’ Uncover the cautionary tale of a buyer navigating the treacherous waters of liability, facing unforeseen legal challenges post-acquisition. Learn…
Posted in federal employment discrimination liability, successor liability Tagged with: Asset Purchase Liability, Buyer Beware, Due diligence in M&A, Federal Employment Discrimination, Legal Risks in Business Acquisitions, Liability in Asset Transactions, M&A legal issues, Mergers and Acquisitions, Risk Management Strategies, successor liability
Asset Buyer Not Liable for Race Discrimination Claim in Employee Hiring Dispute
Explore the legal intricacies of mergers and acquisitions in our latest blog post. Delve into the case of Mance v. Owings Mills Autos, LLC, as we dissect the liabilities of asset buyers regarding employee claims post-acquisition. Gain insights into asset…
Posted in hiring seller's employees, third party beneficiary clause Tagged with: Asset acquisition, Asset buyer obligations, Asset purchase agreement (APA), Business acquisitions, buyer liabilities, Corporate governance, Corporate Law, Corporate transactions, Employee rights, Employment disputes, Employment transition, Legal Liabilities, legal nuances, legal principles, M&A legal, Mance v. Owings Mills Autos LLC, Merger legalities, Race discrimination, Seller expectations, Third-party beneficiary clause
Court Ruling: Fraudulent Actions Allow Seller to Reclaim Business Assets
Explore the riveting legal saga of an M&A deal gone awry, resembling a Shakespearean drama, where a son’s deceit leads to a court ruling allowing the sellers to reclaim business assets. Delve into the intricacies of fiduciary duty, transparency, and…
Posted in fraud in business sale, rescission Tagged with: asset purchase agreement, Business acquisitions, business assets, business ethics, business law, business liabilities, business litigation, business ownership, buyer, Corporate governance, Court decision, court judgment, Court ruling, family drama, Fiduciary Duty, fiduciary obligation, financial matters, fraudulent actions, legal accountability, Legal Case, legal implications, Legal Saga, legal transparency, M&A Disputes, M&A legal, M&A Transactions, seller, transparency, undisclosed liabilities
Buyer Breach of Required Insurance Provision in Acquisition Documents Result in Punitive Damages
Dive into a cautionary M&A tale emphasizing the significance of contractual compliance. Explore a legal case where a buyer’s breach of insurance provision in acquisition documents led to punitive damages. Learn valuable lessons on the importance of adhering to contractual…
Posted in insurance requirements, punitive damages Tagged with: Acquisition Documents, actual-cash-value insurance, business law, Business Transactions, Buyer Obligations, Case Study, Contractual Compliance, Contractual obligations, Court Case, industry compliance, Insurance Coverage, Insurance Provision, Legal Disputes, Legal lessons, Legal Liability, M&A legal issues, Mergers and Acquisitions, Punitive damages, replacement-value insurance, Risk mitigation, Seller Rights
The Vital Role of Boilerplate Provisions in Business Purchase Agreements: Understanding the Forum Selection Clause
Dive into the world of mergers and acquisitions with our latest blog post exploring the critical role of boilerplate provisions, focusing on the forum selection clause. Learn from a real-life case involving Smith & Wesson and Gemini Technologies, where disputes…
Posted in boilerplate provisions, forum selection clause Tagged with: asset purchase agreement, Boilerplate Provisions, Business purchase agreements, Case Study, Contractual obligations, D. Idaho, dispute resolution, Earn-out agreement, Forum selection clause, Gemini Technologies, Legal battles, Legal uncertainties, Litigation strategy, M&A legal, Mergers and Acquisitions, Post-closure disputes, Smith & Wesson, United States District Court
Navigating the Risks of Acquiring Distressed Businesses in Chapter 11: Lessons from a Stalking Horse
Dive into the risky yet alluring world of acquiring distressed businesses in Chapter 11 bankruptcies with our latest M&A blog post. Learn from real-life lessons and cautionary tales of navigating bankruptcy court sales and the intricacies of stalking horse arrangements.…
Posted in distressed business acquisitions Tagged with: Asset acquisition, Auction Process, Bankruptcy Code, bankruptcy court proceedings, bankruptcy court sales, bid procedures, Buyer's Perspective, Case Study, Chapter 11 bankruptcy, court approval, distressed businesses, due diligence, financial risks, Florence Hospital At Anthem LLC, investor caution, Legal Challenges, Legal Risks, Liabilities, M&A legal, Mergers and Acquisitions, Seller's Perspective, stalking horse
Recent Comments