The asset buyer had not assumed this liability in the asset purchase agreement and no common ownership or officer director management between buyer and seller. M&A Stories August 26, 2021 Introduction: When an asset buyer acquires a business, they have…
Blog Archives
ASSET BUYER’S PRODUCTS LIABILITY AS SUCCESSOR: A CASE STUDY
Posted in all cash deal, asset purchase, continuity of ownership, de facto merger exception, mere continuation, mere continuation exception, product line exception, successor liability Tagged with: Asset buyer, asset purchase agreement, Bell v. American International Industries, Case Study, De Facto Merger Rule, M&A legal blog, Mere Continuation Rule, North Carolina Law, products liability, successor liability
INDIANA HIGH COURT CLARIFIES SUCCESSOR LIABILITY IN M&A DEALS
Learn about the recent Indiana Supreme Court ruling on successor liability in asset acquisitions. Understand the exceptions that relieve business asset buyers from seller creditor claims in M&A deals. M&A Stories April 30, 2021 Introduction: When acquiring the assets of…
Posted in continuity of enterprise exception, continuity of ownership, de facto merger exception, successor liability Tagged with: asset acquisitions, business asset buyer, de facto merger, Indiana M&A deals, Indiana Supreme Court ruling, Legal Blog, Mere Continuation, seller creditor claims, successor liability
Lawsuit Over EBITDA Earnout Dispute
Explore a post-closing dispute in mergers and acquisitions (M&A) involving an earnout disagreement related to EBITDA. Learn about a case that highlights the complexities of earnout arrangements and potential legal challenges. June 18, 2019 M&A Stories Introduction: In this mergers…
Posted in bad faith, corporate overhead, de facto merger exception, earn outs, EBITDA Tagged with: asset purchase agreement, corporate overhead, earnout disagreements, EBITDA earnout dispute, fair dealing, Good faith, income expectations, legal challenges in M&A, M&A Disputes, M&A lawsuit, Miranda v. US Security Associates, Post-Closing Dispute
Avoiding Seller Debt in M&A Deals: Buyer’s Protection
Explore the risks of acquiring the assets of a business and potential liability for seller debts in M&A deals. Learn from a real case involving a luxury motor coach company and gain insights into protecting buyers from unexpected liabilities. M&A…
Posted in all cash deal, de facto merger exception, seller ownership in buyer, successor liability Tagged with: All-cash transactions, Asset acquisition, asset purchase agreement, Avoiding legal battles, Business acquisition risks, buyer's protection, Commercial landlords, de facto merger, Liability protection, M&A deals, Nevada Supreme Court ruling, Seller debt, Seller's branding, Seller's liabilities, successor liability, Unexpected liabilities, Upper management
Cash Buyer of Paper Mill Assets Not Liable for Seller’s CERCLA Liability
Explore the legal intricacies of M&A deals involving environmental liabilities. Learn about the concept of de facto mergers and when a cash buyer may or may not be held responsible for a seller’s cleanup obligations. Dive into a real-life case…
Posted in asset purchase agreement, asset seller's liabilities, CERCLA or superfund liability, de facto merger exception, successor liability Tagged with: all cash deal, asset purchase agreement, Buyer's responsibility for cleanup obligations, CERCLA liability, De facto merger in asset deals, Garrett Day LLC v. International Paper Co., M&A environmental liabilities, Ohio federal district court case, Paper mill assets acquisition, Seller's contamination cleanup, Successor liability laws, superfund
New Mexico Court rejects application of de facto merger doctrine to buyer of assets of the maker of hot tar holding tanks
In this case, Seller was a maker of a tar lugger, a holding tank for hot tar that is used in the roofing business. In the fall of 2013, Buyer purchased the assets of Seller’s tar lugger business. About a…
Recent Comments