Introduction This is another post-closing M&A dispute over an EBITDA earnout. The deal The seller was a San Jose based small security guard service. It sold its assets in September 2016 to a Georgia based nationwide security company with about…
Blog Archives
Lawsuit Over EBITDA Earnout “Determined in Accordance With Buyer’s Historical Reporting Policies”
Posted in bad faith, corporate overhead, de facto merger exception, earn outs, EBITDA Tagged with: corporate overhead in earnouts, EBITDA earnouts
No Buyer De Facto Merger Successor Liability for Seller Debt
Introduction One risk in buying the assets of a business is being sued by a seller creditor for a seller liability that the buyer did not assume in the asset purchase agreement. This risk is much higher when buying all…
Cash Buyer of Paper Mill Assets Not Liable for Seller’s CERCLA Liability
Introduction A company is responsible under the federal CERCLA or superfund law, and often state law for cleaning up property it contaminates by hazardous waste disposal. However, the buyer of the assets of the responsible company is generally not liable…
New Mexico Court rejects application of de facto merger doctrine to buyer of assets of the maker of hot tar holding tanks
In this case, Seller was a maker of a tar lugger, a holding tank for hot tar that is used in the roofing business. In the fall of 2013, Buyer purchased the assets of Seller’s tar lugger business. About a…
Recent Comments