Discover how a buyer’s indemnification claim was excused despite missing the time limit in an M&A deal. Learn about the Schillinger Genetics, Inc. v. Benson Hill Seeds, Inc. case and lessons on navigating indemnification claims in mergers and acquisitions. M&A…
Blog Archives
Extending Time for Indemnification Claims in M&A Deals: “No Harm No Foul”
Posted in escrow, excuse for untimely indemnification claim, indemnification Tagged with: 'No Harm No Foul', buyer's claim, compensation rules, Delaware Court of Chancery, escrow funds, grace period for indemnification claims, Indemnification claims, Legal Disputes, M&A deals, Schillinger Genetics v. Benson Hill Seeds, time limit extension
Ensuring Payment of Foreign Taxes in M&A Escrow: Lessons from a Legal Case
Explore a legal case that highlights the importance of addressing foreign tax liabilities in M&A deals. Learn from an $80 million acquisition where inadequate management of escrow arrangements led to a dispute over unpaid Mexican income taxes. Wednesday, July 1,…
Posted in escrow, foreign income tax Tagged with: Acquisition, Buyer's Interests, Case Study, comprehensive escrow agreement, escrow arrangement, escrow funds, foreign taxes, Legal Case, Legal dispute, Lessons learned, M&A, Mexican income tax, Mexican subsidiaries, New York State Court, post-closing period, Publications Intl. v. Phoenix Intl. Publs., statute of limitations, tax liabilities
Seller’s indemnification for environmental remediation costs capped by escrow amount and note adjustment provision
Seller was the owner of Target, a business located in Palo Alto, California that specializes in the electroplating of metal components for industrial use. On June 19, 2014, Seller executed a letter of intent to sell all of Seller’s shares…
Stock sellers lose opening legal battle over buyer’s environmental claim
In November 2007, Sellers of Target agreed to sell Target to Buyer through a stock purchase agreement. When the sale closed in December 2007, Sellers placed $16.7 million into escrow to secure any post-closing claims that Buyer might assert. Target’s…
Delaware Court says that alleged material breach of stock purchase agreement by seller of target company does not excuse buyer from making post-closing payments to seller
On August 31, 2016, Buyer and Sellers entered into a stock purchase agreement in which Buyer agreed to purchase all of Sellers’ shares of Target stock for $93.5 million, subject to certain post-closing adjustments. The transaction closed on October 3, 2016.…
Buyer of business can’t stop release of escrowed funds to seller, because buyer did not follow the escrow agreement’s notice provision
Seller held a number of consumer debt accounts in Puerto Rico. Seller first approached Buyer about a possible sale of Seller’s debt accounts sometime in 2013 and, later that year, the parties entered into discussions. The accounts consisted of auto loans,…
Recent Comments