Explore the intricate world of M&A purchase price adjustments through a compelling legal saga. Uncover the complexities and pitfalls of net working capital valuation in mergers and acquisitions. Delve into a recent case revealing the challenges faced by buyers in challenging purchase price adjustments. Gain insights into contract law nuances and the implications for M&A professionals. Learn from real-world scenarios to enhance diligence and precision in every transaction.
M&A Stories
May 27, 2018
Introduction:
In the intricate dance of mergers and acquisitions, the determination of the purchase price can be a pivotal moment. One commonly utilized mechanism is the net working capital purchase price adjustment, a process designed to ensure fairness and accuracy in valuation. However, a recent case sheds light on the complexities and pitfalls inherent in this approach.
Background:
In this scenario, a buyer ventured into the acquisition of assets from a seller emerging from bankruptcy. The asset purchase agreement meticulously outlined a net working capital purchase price adjustment mechanism. This entailed an estimation of net working capital at the closing of the deal, with subsequent adjustments to the purchase price based on the final agreed-upon figure.
The Unforeseen Twist:
Post-closing, the buyer made a startling discovery: the final net working capital figure exceeded the initial estimation by a substantial margin, overstating it by over $500,000. Naturally, the buyer sought recourse, advocating for a reduction in the purchase price to rectify the perceived discrepancy.
Legal Wrangle:
Enter the courtroom, where the buyer invoked the concept of “mutual mistake” to justify their plea for a contract reformation, aiming to slash the purchase price by the aforementioned amount. However, the court’s response was nuanced and instructive.
Court’s Verdict:
While acknowledging the possibility of contract reformation in cases of mutual mistake, the court exercised restraint in this instance. Notably, the court scrutinized the sophistication of the involved parties, emphasizing their status as seasoned M&A professionals. In such a context, the burden of proving a mutual mistake was amplified, requiring evidence beyond doubt.
Implications and Lessons Learned:
Ultimately, the court’s decision underscored a fundamental principle: accountability in the realm of mergers and acquisitions. Both buyers and sellers, irrespective of their expertise, are reminded of the imperative to exercise diligence and precision in purchase price adjustments. This cautionary tale serves as a beacon for future dealmakers, highlighting the importance of meticulousness and transparency in every transaction.
Conclusion: I
n the labyrinthine landscape of M&A, the saga of net working capital purchase price adjustments offers invaluable insights. Through the lens of this case, stakeholders are reminded of the delicate balance between opportunity and risk inherent in every deal. As the wheels of commerce continue to turn, vigilance and prudence remain indispensable virtues for those navigating the corridors of mergers and acquisitions.
Case Reference:
In Re Taylor-Wharton International LLC, Case No. 15-12075 (BLS), (Jointly Administered), United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Delaware (April 12, 2018).
By John McCauley: I help people start, grow, buy and sell their businesses.
Email: jmccauley@mk-law.com
Profile: http://www.martindale.com/John-B-McCauley/176725-lawyer.htm
Telephone: 714 273-6291
Check out my book: Buying Assets of a Small Business: Problems Taken From Recent Legal Battles
Recent Comments