Explore the complexities of auto dealership transactions, using the case of Foundation Auto Holdings, LLC v. Weber Motors, Fresno, Inc. Learn valuable lessons from this M&A story involving BMW, Audi, and Porsche brands. Uncover the legal actions, key findings, and…
Blog Archives
Buyer’s Rights to Offset Environmental Legal Costs in M&A Deals
Explore the nuances of buyer offset rights in M&A deals and their application in a real-world case. Learn how a Delaware court ruled on a seller’s challenge to offset legal costs in a post-closing environmental litigation. September 9, 2019 M&A…
Posted in environmental, indemnification, offset or setoff provision Tagged with: Asset purchase agreement (APA), Buyer's offset rights, California environmental litigation, Chrome plating business, Delaware Superior Court, Environmental legal costs, Legal challenge in M&A, M&A offset rights, Post-closing contamination, Seller indemnification, setoff rights
Seller’s Earnout Lawsuit Verdict: Strategic Buyer’s Actions Deemed Not in Bad Faith
Explore a recent M&A case involving a seller’s earnout lawsuit against a strategic buyer. Delve into the details of the case and its implications for the M&A landscape. Learn about the importance of precise APA language and the challenges sellers…
Posted in earn outs, implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing Tagged with: Asset purchase agreement (APA), bad faith, Breach of contract. Good faith, Buyer's actions, Case reference: Huntingford v. Pharmacy Corporation of America, Customer accounts, Delaware law, Earnout clause, Gross profits, M&A agreements, M&A lawsuit, Seller's Earnout, Strategic buyer
M&A Integration Provision and Exclusive Remedy Clause: How They Impact Seller Claims
Explore the crucial role of the APA Integration Provision and Exclusive Remedy Clause in a recent M&A case involving a Denver-based seller and a Houston-based buyer. Discover key allegations, the seller’s claim, the court’s decision, and the legal obstacles faced…
Posted in earn out, economic loss doctrine, exclusive remedy, integration clause Tagged with: Asset purchase agreement (APA), Business Closure, Case Reference: In Re Allonhill, Colorado Choice of Law, Contractual Remedies, Court's Decision, Denver-Based Seller, Earnout Payments, economic loss rule, Exclusive Remedy Clause, Houston-Based Buyer, integration clause, legal challenges in M&A, Legal Provisions in M&A, LLC, M&A Integration Provision, M&A legal blog, Material Misrepresentations, Negligent Misrepresentation, Seller Claims, Tort Liability
Asset Buyer Not Liable for Race Discrimination Claim in Employee Hiring Dispute
Explore the legal intricacies of mergers and acquisitions in our latest blog post. Delve into the case of Mance v. Owings Mills Autos, LLC, as we dissect the liabilities of asset buyers regarding employee claims post-acquisition. Gain insights into asset…
Posted in hiring seller's employees, third party beneficiary clause Tagged with: Asset acquisition, Asset buyer obligations, Asset purchase agreement (APA), Business acquisitions, buyer liabilities, Corporate governance, Corporate Law, Corporate transactions, Employee rights, Employment disputes, Employment transition, Legal Liabilities, legal nuances, legal principles, M&A legal, Mance v. Owings Mills Autos LLC, Merger legalities, Race discrimination, Seller expectations, Third-party beneficiary clause
Recent Comments